Protests 615261-G of A. Rosen & Sons, Inc.
10 Cust. Ct. 388
Opinion
Opinion by
It was stipulated that certain of the items in question are similar to those involved in Caradine v. United States (9 Cust. Ct. 69, C. D. 664). Some of the harvest hats were therefore held dutiable at 25 percent ad valorem under paragraph 1504 (b) (5) and those entered or withdrawn for consumption subsequent to the date of the said trade agreement were held dutiable at 12Yz percent under paragraph 1504 (b) (5) as claimed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Protests 615261-G of A. Rosen & Sons, Inc., 10 Cust. Ct. 388 (cusc 1943).
10 Cust. Ct. 388 (Protests 615261-G of A. Rosen & Sons, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Caradine Hat Co. v. United States
9 Cust. Ct. 69 (U.S. Customs Court, 1942)