Protests 603146-G of Katz
10 Cust. Ct. 389
Opinion
Opinion by
Certain of the items in question were stipulated to be similar to those the subject of Caradine v. United States (9 Cust. Ct. 69, C. D. 664). In accordance therewith some were held dutiable at 25 percent ad valorem under paragraph 1504 (b) (5), and those entered or withdrawn for consumption subsequent to the effective date of the said trade agreement were held dutiable at 12)4 percent under paragraph 1504 (b) (5) as claimed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Protests 603146-G of Katz, 10 Cust. Ct. 389 (cusc 1943).
10 Cust. Ct. 389 (Protests 603146-G of Katz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Caradine Hat Co. v. United States
9 Cust. Ct. 69 (U.S. Customs Court, 1942)