Protests 602215-G of C. S. Emery & Co.

U.S. Customs Court

Protests 602215-G of C. S. Emery & Co.

3 Cust. Ct. 322

United States Customs Court·Decided July 5, 1939·No. No. 41778·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

McClelland, P. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of Emery v. United States (T. D. 46702) and Myers v. United States (T. D. 49530) the protests were sustained, and it was held that the mean average of the thickness of the edges of the clapboards in the condition as imported should have been taken in imposing the tax under section 601 (c) (6), Revenue Act of 1932.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

McClelland, P. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of Emery v. United States (T. D. 46702) and Myers v. United States (T. D. 49530) the protests were sustained, and it was held that the mean average of the thickness of the edges of the clapboards in the condition as imported should have been taken in imposing the tax under section 601 (c) (6), Revenue Act of 1932.

Protests 602215-G of C. S. Emery & Co., 3 Cust. Ct. 322 (cusc 1939).

Pincite

3 Cust. Ct. 322 (Protests 602215-G of C. S. Emery & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.