Protests 585856-G of Joseph, Inc.

U.S. Customs Court

Protests 585856-G of Joseph, Inc.

5 Cust. Ct. 254

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedJune 21, 1940

DocketNo. 43989

StatusPublished

This text of 5 Cust. Ct. 254 (Protests 585856-G of Joseph, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Protests 585856-G of Joseph, Inc., 5 Cust. Ct. 254 (cusc 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

[255]*255Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel flouncings, galloons, trimmings, insertings, or allovers composed of net and embroidered, the same as those the subject of United States v. Ramig (17 C. C. P. A. 365, T. D. 43809), embroidered wearing apparel like that passed upon in Glemby’s v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 533, T. D. 41397), Alegon laces similar to those the subject of United States v. Caesar (18 C. C. P. A. 106, T. D. 44067), filet laces like those passed upon in United States v. Jabara (22 id. 77, T. D. 47065), and Normandy laces similar to those covered by United States v. Amrein (26 id. 353, C. A. D. 40) were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 as claimed. Silk wearing apparel the same as that passed upon in Abstruct 29972 was held dutiable at 60 percent under paragraph 1210.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[255]*255Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel flouncings, galloons, trimmings, insertings, or allovers composed of net and embroidered, the same as those the subject of United States v. Ramig (17 C. C. P. A. 365, T. D. 43809), embroidered wearing apparel like that passed upon in Glemby’s v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 533, T. D. 41397), Alegon laces similar to those the subject of United States v. Caesar (18 C. C. P. A. 106, T. D. 44067), filet laces like those passed upon in United States v. Jabara (22 id. 77, T. D. 47065), and Normandy laces similar to those covered by United States v. Amrein (26 id. 353, C. A. D. 40) were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 as claimed. Silk wearing apparel the same as that passed upon in Abstruct 29972 was held dutiable at 60 percent under paragraph 1210.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

5 Cust. Ct. 254, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protests-585856-g-of-joseph-inc-cusc-1940.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack