Protests 557965-G of Irving L. Hartman & Co.

10 Cust. Ct. 448
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedMay 3, 1943
DocketNo. 48248
StatusPublished

This text of 10 Cust. Ct. 448 (Protests 557965-G of Irving L. Hartman & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Protests 557965-G of Irving L. Hartman & Co., 10 Cust. Ct. 448 (cusc 1943).

Opinion

Opinion by.

Tilson, J.

In accordance with agreement oof counsel that the harvest hats in question are similar to those involved in Caradine v. United States (9 Cust. Ct. 69, C. D. 664) those entered or withdrawn for consumption prior to February 1, 1936, were held dutiable at 25 percent ad valorem under paragraph 1504 (b) (5) and those subsequent to said date were held dutiable at 12)4 percent ad valorem under paragraph 1504 (b) (5) and the Netherlands Trade Agreement (T. D. 48075). Protests sustained to this extent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Caradine Hat Co. v. United States
9 Cust. Ct. 69 (U.S. Customs Court, 1942)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
10 Cust. Ct. 448, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protests-557965-g-of-irving-l-hartman-co-cusc-1943.