Protests 557965-G of Irving L. Hartman & Co.
10 Cust. Ct. 448
Opinion
Opinion by.
In accordance with agreement oof counsel that the harvest hats in question are similar to those involved in Caradine v. United States (9 Cust. Ct. 69, C. D. 664) those entered or withdrawn for consumption prior to February 1, 1936, were held dutiable at 25 percent ad valorem under paragraph 1504 (b) (5) and those subsequent to said date were held dutiable at 12)4 percent ad valorem under paragraph 1504 (b) (5) and the Netherlands Trade Agreement (T. D. 48075). Protests sustained to this extent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Protests 557965-G of Irving L. Hartman & Co., 10 Cust. Ct. 448 (cusc 1943).
10 Cust. Ct. 448 (Protests 557965-G of Irving L. Hartman & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Caradine Hat Co. v. United States
9 Cust. Ct. 69 (U.S. Customs Court, 1942)