Protests 556413-G of Ecuadorian Panama Hat Co.

10 Cust. Ct. 383
United States Customs Court·Decided January 27, 1943·No. No. 47962·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the harvest hats in question, valued at less than $3 per dozen, are the same in all material respects as those involved in Caradine Hat Co. v. United States (9 Cust. Ct. 69, C. D. 664), some of the harvest hats were held dutiable at 25 percent ad valorem under paragraph 1504 (b) (5) and others imported or withdrawn for consumption subsequent to the Netherlands Trade Agreement (T. D. 48075) were held dutiable at only 12^ percent ad valorem under paragraph 1504 (b) (5) and the said trade agreement.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Protests 556413-G of Ecuadorian Panama Hat Co., 10 Cust. Ct. 383 (cusc 1943).

10 Cust. Ct. 383 (Protests 556413-G of Ecuadorian Panama Hat Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Caradine Hat Co. v. United States
9 Cust. Ct. 69 (U.S. Customs Court, 1942)