Protests 552147-G of Irving L. Hartman Co.
This text of 11 Cust. Ct. 303 (Protests 552147-G of Irving L. Hartman Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel certain of the hats found to be harvest hats similar to those involved in Caradine v. United States (9 Cust. Ct. 69, C. D. 664) were held dutiable at 25 percent under paragraph 1504 (b) (5), and certain other hats similar to those involved in United States v. Armand Schwab (30 C. C. P. A. 72, C. A. D. 218) were held dutiable as hemp hats, not bleached, at 25 percent under paragraph 1504 (b) (1), as claimed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
11 Cust. Ct. 303, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protests-552147-g-of-irving-l-hartman-co-cusc-1943.