Protests 548581-G of Charles Baum Co.

U.S. Customs Court

Protests 548581-G of Charles Baum Co.

1 Cust. Ct. 446

United States Customs Court·Decided October 17, 1938·No. No. 39629·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of flasks, sprinklers, atomizers, and boxes chiefly used in the household for utilitarian purposes or hollow ware. The claim at 40 percent under paragraph 339 was therefore sustained. United States v. Friedlaender (21 C. C. P. A. 103, T. D. 46445), Dow v. United States (id. 282, T. D. 46816), and Rice v. United States (T. D. 49373) cited.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of flasks, sprinklers, atomizers, and boxes chiefly used in the household for utilitarian purposes or hollow ware. The claim at 40 percent under paragraph 339 was therefore sustained. United States v. Friedlaender (21 C. C. P. A. 103, T. D. 46445), Dow v. United States (id. 282, T. D. 46816), and Rice v. United States (T. D. 49373) cited.

Protests 548581-G of Charles Baum Co., 1 Cust. Ct. 446 (cusc 1938).

Pincite

1 Cust. Ct. 446 (Protests 548581-G of Charles Baum Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.