Protests 547883-G of Rosen

12 Cust. Ct. 231
United States Customs Court·Decided December 29, 1943·No. No. 49074·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

The testimony showed that certain of the items consist of hats similar to those involved in Caradine v. United States (9 Cust. Ct. 69, C. D. 664), the record in which case was admitted in evidence herein. In accordance therewith those imported or withdrawn for consumption prior to the Netherlands Trade Agreement (T. D. 48075) were held dutiable at 25 percent ad valorem under paragraph 1504 (b) (5), and those imported or withdrawn for consumption subsequent to said trade agreement were held dutiable at 12)4 percent under paragraph 1504 (b) (5) and T. D. 48075.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Protests 547883-G of Rosen, 12 Cust. Ct. 231 (cusc 1943).

12 Cust. Ct. 231 (Protests 547883-G of Rosen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Caradine Hat Co. v. United States
9 Cust. Ct. 69 (U.S. Customs Court, 1942)