Protests 526976-G of M. E. Friedlander, Inc.
This text of 16 Cust. Ct. 227 (Protests 526976-G of M. E. Friedlander, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
At the trial it was shown by the testimony that the merchandise consists of hats known as harvest hats, valued at less than $3 per dozen, and similar in all material respects to those the subject of Caradine Hat Co. v. United States (9 Cust. Ct. 69, C. D. 664). Upon the established facts and following the cited authority the items of merchandise imported or withdrawn for consumption prior to the effective date of the Netherlands Trade Agreement (T. D. 48075) were held dutiable at only 25 percent under paragraph 1504 (b) (5), and those items entered or withdrawn for consumption subsequent to said date were held dutiable at 12)4 percent under the same paragraph.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
16 Cust. Ct. 227, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protests-526976-g-of-m-e-friedlander-inc-cusc-1946.