Protests 526976-G of M. E. Friedlander, Inc.

16 Cust. Ct. 227
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedFebruary 20, 1946
DocketNo. 50897
StatusPublished

This text of 16 Cust. Ct. 227 (Protests 526976-G of M. E. Friedlander, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Protests 526976-G of M. E. Friedlander, Inc., 16 Cust. Ct. 227 (cusc 1946).

Opinion

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

At the trial it was shown by the testimony that the merchandise consists of hats known as harvest hats, valued at less than $3 per dozen, and similar in all material respects to those the subject of Caradine Hat Co. v. United States (9 Cust. Ct. 69, C. D. 664). Upon the established facts and following the cited authority the items of merchandise imported or withdrawn for consumption prior to the effective date of the Netherlands Trade Agreement (T. D. 48075) were held dutiable at only 25 percent under paragraph 1504 (b) (5), and those items entered or withdrawn for consumption subsequent to said date were held dutiable at 12)4 percent under the same paragraph.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Caradine Hat Co. v. United States
9 Cust. Ct. 69 (U.S. Customs Court, 1942)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
16 Cust. Ct. 227, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protests-526976-g-of-m-e-friedlander-inc-cusc-1946.