Protests 526976-G of M. E. Friedlander, Inc.

U.S. Customs Court

Protests 526976-G of M. E. Friedlander, Inc.

16 Cust. Ct. 227

United States Customs Court·Decided February 20, 1946·No. No. 50897·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

At the trial it was shown by the testimony that the merchandise consists of hats known as harvest hats, valued at less than $3 per dozen, and similar in all material respects to those the subject of Caradine Hat Co. v. United States (9 Cust. Ct. 69, C. D. 664). Upon the established facts and following the cited authority the items of merchandise imported or withdrawn for consumption prior to the effective date of the Netherlands Trade Agreement (T. D. 48075) were held dutiable at only 25 percent under paragraph 1504 (b) (5), and those items entered or withdrawn for consumption subsequent to said date were held dutiable at 12)4 percent under the same paragraph.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

At the trial it was shown by the testimony that the merchandise consists of hats known as harvest hats, valued at less than $3 per dozen, and similar in all material respects to those the subject of Caradine Hat Co. v. United States (9 Cust. Ct. 69, C. D. 664). Upon the established facts and following the cited authority the items of merchandise imported or withdrawn for consumption prior to the effective date of the Netherlands Trade Agreement (T. D. 48075) were held dutiable at only 25 percent under paragraph 1504 (b) (5), and those items entered or withdrawn for consumption subsequent to said date were held dutiable at 12)4 percent under the same paragraph.

Protests 526976-G of M. E. Friedlander, Inc., 16 Cust. Ct. 227 (cusc 1946).

Pincite

16 Cust. Ct. 227 (Protests 526976-G of M. E. Friedlander, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related