Protests 516290-G of Ferd. Bing & Co.'s Successors

U.S. Customs Court

Protests 516290-G of Ferd. Bing & Co.'s Successors

1 Cust. Ct. 437

United States Customs Court·Decided October 11, 1938·No. No. 39573·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Dallingek, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of atomizers, boxes, bottles, vases, coupes, inkstands, trays, and jardinieres chiefly used in the household for utilitarian purposes or hollow ware. The claim at 40 percent under paragraph 339 was therefore sustained. United States v. Friedlaender (21 C. C. P. A. 103, T. D. 46445), Dow v. United States (id. 282, T. D. 46816), and Rice v. United States (T. D. 49373) cited.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Dallingek, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of atomizers, boxes, bottles, vases, coupes, inkstands, trays, and jardinieres chiefly used in the household for utilitarian purposes or hollow ware. The claim at 40 percent under paragraph 339 was therefore sustained. United States v. Friedlaender (21 C. C. P. A. 103, T. D. 46445), Dow v. United States (id. 282, T. D. 46816), and Rice v. United States (T. D. 49373) cited.

Protests 516290-G of Ferd. Bing & Co.'s Successors, 1 Cust. Ct. 437 (cusc 1938).

Pincite

1 Cust. Ct. 437 (Protests 516290-G of Ferd. Bing & Co.'s Successors) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.