Protests 5128-G of Wanamaker

4 Cust. Ct. 418
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedMarch 11, 1940
DocketNo. 43354
StatusPublished

This text of 4 Cust. Ct. 418 (Protests 5128-G of Wanamaker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Protests 5128-G of Wanamaker, 4 Cust. Ct. 418 (cusc 1940).

Opinion

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of Glemby’s v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 533, T. D. 41397), United States v. Smith (12 id. 384, T. D. 40544), G. A. 9111 (T. D. 41468), and United States v. Amrein (26 C. C. P. A. 353, C. A. D. 40), embroidered wearing apparel and articles, embroidered allovers, and Normandy lace were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430. Straw hats trimmed with lace were held dutiable at 60 percent under paragraph 1406.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Glemby's Sons Co. v. United States
13 Ct. Cust. 533 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1926)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 Cust. Ct. 418, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protests-5128-g-of-wanamaker-cusc-1940.