Protests 507514-G of Gimbel Bros., Inc.

U.S. Customs Court

Protests 507514-G of Gimbel Bros., Inc.

2 Cust. Ct. 581

United States Customs Court·Decided February 17, 1939·No. No. 40660·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of atomizers, boxes, bowls, trays, inkstands, bookends, match boxes, and baskets chiefly used in the household for utilitarian purposes. The claim at 4.0 percent under paragraph 339 was therefore sustained. United States v. Friedlaender (21 C. C. P. A. 103, T. D. 46445), Dow v. United States (id. 282, T. D. 46816), and Rice v. United States (T. D. 49373) cited.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of atomizers, boxes, bowls, trays, inkstands, bookends, match boxes, and baskets chiefly used in the household for utilitarian purposes. The claim at 4.0 percent under paragraph 339 was therefore sustained. United States v. Friedlaender (21 C. C. P. A. 103, T. D. 46445), Dow v. United States (id. 282, T. D. 46816), and Rice v. United States (T. D. 49373) cited.

Protests 507514-G of Gimbel Bros., Inc., 2 Cust. Ct. 581 (cusc 1939).

Pincite

2 Cust. Ct. 581 (Protests 507514-G of Gimbel Bros., Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.