Protests 428900-G of Amrein Freudenberg & Co.
This text of 6 Cust. Ct. 621 (Protests 428900-G of Amrein Freudenberg & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
It appeared that the merchandise is Normandy laces similar to those the subject of United States v. Amrein (26 C. C. P. A. 353, C. A. D. [622]*62240), embroidered fiouncings like those involved in Pustet v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 530, T. D. 41396), embroideries on cotton cloth similar to'those passed upon in United States v. Smith (12 id. 384, T. D. 40544), embroidered fiouncings like those involved in United States v. Ramig (17 C. C. P. A. 365, T. D. 43809), and filet laces the same as those the subject of United States v. Caesar (18 id. 106, T. D. 44067). The claim at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 was therefore sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
6 Cust. Ct. 621, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protests-428900-g-of-amrein-freudenberg-co-cusc-1941.