Protests 428900-G of Amrein Freudenberg & Co.

6 Cust. Ct. 621
United States Customs Court·Decided April 30, 1941·No. No. 45791·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

It appeared that the merchandise is Normandy laces similar to those the subject of United States v. Amrein (26 C. C. P. A. 353, C. A. D. [622]*62240), embroidered fiouncings like those involved in Pustet v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 530, T. D. 41396), embroideries on cotton cloth similar to'those passed upon in United States v. Smith (12 id. 384, T. D. 40544), embroidered fiouncings like those involved in United States v. Ramig (17 C. C. P. A. 365, T. D. 43809), and filet laces the same as those the subject of United States v. Caesar (18 id. 106, T. D. 44067). The claim at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 was therefore sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Protests 428900-G of Amrein Freudenberg & Co., 6 Cust. Ct. 621 (cusc 1941).

6 Cust. Ct. 621 (Protests 428900-G of Amrein Freudenberg & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pustet v. United States
13 Ct. Cust. 530 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1926)