Protests 419135-G of Gimbel Bros.

U.S. Customs Court

Protests 419135-G of Gimbel Bros.

3 Cust. Ct. 404

United States Customs Court·Decided September 21, 1939·No. No. 42239·Published

Opinion

[405] Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel filet lace articles similar to those involved in United States v. Jabara (22 C. C. P. A. 77, T. D. 47065), Normandy lace articles like those passed upon in Amrein v. United States (T. D. 49551), and wearing apparel and other articles similar to those the subject of Pustet v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 530, T. D. 41396) were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 as claimed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[405] Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel filet lace articles similar to those involved in United States v. Jabara (22 C. C. P. A. 77, T. D. 47065), Normandy lace articles like those passed upon in Amrein v. United States (T. D. 49551), and wearing apparel and other articles similar to those the subject of Pustet v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 530, T. D. 41396) were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 as claimed.

Protests 419135-G of Gimbel Bros., 3 Cust. Ct. 404 (cusc 1939).

Pincite

3 Cust. Ct. 404 (Protests 419135-G of Gimbel Bros.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related