Protests 419135-G of Gimbel Bros.

3 Cust. Ct. 404
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedSeptember 21, 1939
DocketNo. 42239
StatusPublished

This text of 3 Cust. Ct. 404 (Protests 419135-G of Gimbel Bros.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Protests 419135-G of Gimbel Bros., 3 Cust. Ct. 404 (cusc 1939).

Opinion

[405]*405Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel filet lace articles similar to those involved in United States v. Jabara (22 C. C. P. A. 77, T. D. 47065), Normandy lace articles like those passed upon in Amrein v. United States (T. D. 49551), and wearing apparel and other articles similar to those the subject of Pustet v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 530, T. D. 41396) were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 as claimed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pustet v. United States
13 Ct. Cust. 530 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1926)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 Cust. Ct. 404, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protests-419135-g-of-gimbel-bros-cusc-1939.