Protests 419135-G of Gimbel Bros.
This text of 3 Cust. Ct. 404 (Protests 419135-G of Gimbel Bros.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[405]*405Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel filet lace articles similar to those involved in United States v. Jabara (22 C. C. P. A. 77, T. D. 47065), Normandy lace articles like those passed upon in Amrein v. United States (T. D. 49551), and wearing apparel and other articles similar to those the subject of Pustet v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 530, T. D. 41396) were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 as claimed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
3 Cust. Ct. 404, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protests-419135-g-of-gimbel-bros-cusc-1939.