Protests 413055-G of Saks

U.S. Customs Court

Protests 413055-G of Saks

2 Cust. Ct. 545

United States Customs Court·Decided January 17, 1939·No. No. 40451·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel atomizers, boxes, incense burners, and photo frames chiefly used in the household for utilitarian purposes were held dutiable at 40 percent under paragraph 339. United States v. Friedlaender (21 C. C. P. A. 103, T. D. 46445, Dow v. United States (id. 282, T. D. 46816), Woolworth v. United States (T. D. 47857), and Rice v. United States (T. D. 49373) cited. Mirrors similar to those the subject of Abstract 8950 were held dutiable at 50 percent under paragraph 230.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel atomizers, boxes, incense burners, and photo frames chiefly used in the household for utilitarian purposes were held dutiable at 40 percent under paragraph 339. United States v. Friedlaender (21 C. C. P. A. 103, T. D. 46445, Dow v. United States (id. 282, T. D. 46816), Woolworth v. United States (T. D. 47857), and Rice v. United States (T. D. 49373) cited. Mirrors similar to those the subject of Abstract 8950 were held dutiable at 50 percent under paragraph 230.

Protests 413055-G of Saks, 2 Cust. Ct. 545 (cusc 1939).

Pincite

2 Cust. Ct. 545 (Protests 413055-G of Saks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.