Protests 410515-G of Wanamaker

U.S. Customs Court

Protests 410515-G of Wanamaker

4 Cust. Ct. 430

United States Customs Court·Decided March 21, 1940·No. No. 43412·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of United States v. Caesar (18 C. C. P. A. 106, T. D. 44067), Glemby’s v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 533, T. D. 41397), and United States v. Amrein (26 C. C. P. A. 353, C. A. D. 40) Alengon lace, embroidered wearing apparel in part of lace, and Normandy lace were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 as claimed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of United States v. Caesar (18 C. C. P. A. 106, T. D. 44067), Glemby’s v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 533, T. D. 41397), and United States v. Amrein (26 C. C. P. A. 353, C. A. D. 40) Alengon lace, embroidered wearing apparel in part of lace, and Normandy lace were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 as claimed.

Protests 410515-G of Wanamaker, 4 Cust. Ct. 430 (cusc 1940).

Pincite

4 Cust. Ct. 430 (Protests 410515-G of Wanamaker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related