Protests 409345-G of American Shipping Co.

U.S. Customs Court

Protests 409345-G of American Shipping Co.

4 Cust. Ct. 405

United States Customs Court·Decided February 28, 1940·No. No. 43287·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

It was stipulated that certain items consist of embroidered articles in part of braid, lace, or trimming the same as those passed upon in Glemby’s v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 533, T. D. 41397), Normandy lace like that the subject of United States v. Amrein (26 C. C. P. A. 353, C. A. D. 40), and filet lace like that the subject of United States v. Jabara (22 id. 77, T. D. 47065). The claim at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 was therefore sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

It was stipulated that certain items consist of embroidered articles in part of braid, lace, or trimming the same as those passed upon in Glemby’s v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 533, T. D. 41397), Normandy lace like that the subject of United States v. Amrein (26 C. C. P. A. 353, C. A. D. 40), and filet lace like that the subject of United States v. Jabara (22 id. 77, T. D. 47065). The claim at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 was therefore sustained.

Protests 409345-G of American Shipping Co., 4 Cust. Ct. 405 (cusc 1940).

Pincite

4 Cust. Ct. 405 (Protests 409345-G of American Shipping Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related