Protests 38118-K of Andrew Makris & Bros.

U.S. Customs Court

Protests 38118-K of Andrew Makris & Bros.

17 Cust. Ct. 161

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedJune 28, 1946

DocketNo. 51230

StatusPublished

This text of 17 Cust. Ct. 161 (Protests 38118-K of Andrew Makris & Bros.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Protests 38118-K of Andrew Makris & Bros., 17 Cust. Ct. 161 (cusc 1946).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It was stipulated that certain items of the merchandise consist of cheese similar in all material respects to that the subject of Scaramelli v. United States (9 Cust. Ct. 270, C. D. 706) and Abstract 42146. In accordance therewith it was held that an allowance of 2)4 percent should have been made in the weight of the cheese by the collector in computing the duty thereon to compensate for the weight of the inedible coverings on the outside of the cheese. The protests were sustained to this extent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It was stipulated that certain items of the merchandise consist of cheese similar in all material respects to that the subject of Scaramelli v. United States (9 Cust. Ct. 270, C. D. 706) and Abstract 42146. In accordance therewith it was held that an allowance of 2)4 percent should have been made in the weight of the cheese by the collector in computing the duty thereon to compensate for the weight of the inedible coverings on the outside of the cheese. The protests were sustained to this extent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

17 Cust. Ct. 161, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protests-38118-k-of-andrew-makris-bros-cusc-1946.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack