Protests 377850-G of Steindardt Bros., Inc.

U.S. Customs Court

Protests 377850-G of Steindardt Bros., Inc.

1 Cust. Ct. 541

United States Customs Court·Decided December 16, 1938·No. No. 40139·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of atomizers, boxes, and trays chiefly used in the household for utilitarian purposes or hollow ware. The claim at 40 percent under paragraph 339 was therefore sustained. United States v. Friedlaender (21 C. C. P. A. 103, T. D. 46445), Dow v. United States (id. 282, T. D. 46816), and Rice v. United States (T. D. 49373) cited.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of atomizers, boxes, and trays chiefly used in the household for utilitarian purposes or hollow ware. The claim at 40 percent under paragraph 339 was therefore sustained. United States v. Friedlaender (21 C. C. P. A. 103, T. D. 46445), Dow v. United States (id. 282, T. D. 46816), and Rice v. United States (T. D. 49373) cited.

Protests 377850-G of Steindardt Bros., Inc., 1 Cust. Ct. 541 (cusc 1938).

Pincite

1 Cust. Ct. 541 (Protests 377850-G of Steindardt Bros., Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.