Protests 373326-G of R. H. Macy & Co.

U.S. Customs Court

Protests 373326-G of R. H. Macy & Co.

4 Cust. Ct. 370

United States Customs Court·Decided January 19, 1940·No. No. 43047·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel lace window curtains similar to those the subject of Billwiller v. United States (T. D. 44911) and filet articles like those passed upon in United States v. Jabara (22 C. C. P. A. 77, T. D. 47065) were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430. Artificial flowers of the same character as those the subject of Robinson-Goodman v. United States (17 C. C. P. A. 149, T. D. 43473) were held dutiable at 60 percent under paragraph 1419.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel lace window curtains similar to those the subject of Billwiller v. United States (T. D. 44911) and filet articles like those passed upon in United States v. Jabara (22 C. C. P. A. 77, T. D. 47065) were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430. Artificial flowers of the same character as those the subject of Robinson-Goodman v. United States (17 C. C. P. A. 149, T. D. 43473) were held dutiable at 60 percent under paragraph 1419.

Protests 373326-G of R. H. Macy & Co., 4 Cust. Ct. 370 (cusc 1940).

Pincite

4 Cust. Ct. 370 (Protests 373326-G of R. H. Macy & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.