Protests 372630-G of Bernard

U.S. Customs Court

Protests 372630-G of Bernard

1 Cust. Ct. 520

United States Customs Court·Decided December 6, 1938·No. No. 40024·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Dallingeb, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of atomizers, bottles, boxes, cream jars, droppers, toothbrush tubes, trays, powder boxes, flacons, and toilet set used chiefly for utilitarian purposes in the kitchen, household, or on the table, or hollow ware. The claim at 40 percent under paragraph 339 was therefore sustained. Rice v. United States (T. D. 49373) followed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Dallingeb, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of atomizers, bottles, boxes, cream jars, droppers, toothbrush tubes, trays, powder boxes, flacons, and toilet set used chiefly for utilitarian purposes in the kitchen, household, or on the table, or hollow ware. The claim at 40 percent under paragraph 339 was therefore sustained. Rice v. United States (T. D. 49373) followed.

Protests 372630-G of Bernard, 1 Cust. Ct. 520 (cusc 1938).

Pincite

1 Cust. Ct. 520 (Protests 372630-G of Bernard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.