Protests 372351-G of Saks

U.S. Customs Court

Protests 372351-G of Saks

3 Cust. Ct. 432

United States Customs Court·Decided October 11, 1939·No. No. 42393·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel, boxes, incense burners, cocktail sets, cakestands, tantalus set (liquor set), bottles, atomizers, jars, cocktail shakers, and atomizers and droppers plated with gold or silver were held dutiable as table or household utensils at 40 percent under paragraph 399. United States v. Friedlaender (21 C. C. P. A. 103, T. D. 46445), Dow v. United States (id. 282, T. D. 46816), Rice v. United States (T. D. 49373), and Abstract 39456 cited. Hollow flasks, canteens, and sandwich boxes were held dutiable as hollow ware at the same rate under the same paragraph. Viking Trading Co. v. United States (C. D. 132) cited.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel, boxes, incense burners, cocktail sets, cakestands, tantalus set (liquor set), bottles, atomizers, jars, cocktail shakers, and atomizers and droppers plated with gold or silver were held dutiable as table or household utensils at 40 percent under paragraph 399. United States v. Friedlaender (21 C. C. P. A. 103, T. D. 46445), Dow v. United States (id. 282, T. D. 46816), Rice v. United States (T. D. 49373), and Abstract 39456 cited. Hollow flasks, canteens, and sandwich boxes were held dutiable as hollow ware at the same rate under the same paragraph. Viking Trading Co. v. United States (C. D. 132) cited.

Protests 372351-G of Saks, 3 Cust. Ct. 432 (cusc 1939).

Pincite

3 Cust. Ct. 432 (Protests 372351-G of Saks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.