Protests 36693-G of Joseph, Inc.

U.S. Customs Court

Protests 36693-G of Joseph, Inc.

2 Cust. Ct. 504

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedDecember 27, 1938

DocketNo. 40233

StatusPublished

This text of 2 Cust. Ct. 504 (Protests 36693-G of Joseph, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Protests 36693-G of Joseph, Inc., 2 Cust. Ct. 504 (cusc 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the merchandise in question was held dutiable as follows: (1) fabrics or articles composed wholly or in chief value of artificial silk the same as those passed upon in Abstract 37230 at 60 percent under paragraph 31; (2) embroidered wearing apparel in part of lace or trimmings at 75 percent under paragraph 1430, Glemby’s v. United States, (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 533, T. D. 41397) followed; (3) artificial flowers the same as those passed upon in Robinson-Goodman v. United States (17 C. C. P. A. 149, T. D. [505]*50543473) at 60 percent under paragraph 1419; (4) silk wearing apparel or silk articles the same as those involved in Abstract 29972 at 60 percent under paragraph 1210; and (6) hats in chief value of straw the same as those passed upon in Stern v. United States (12 Ct. Cust. Appls. 514, T. D. 40701) at 50 percent under paragraph 1406.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the merchandise in question was held dutiable as follows: (1) fabrics or articles composed wholly or in chief value of artificial silk the same as those passed upon in Abstract 37230 at 60 percent under paragraph 31; (2) embroidered wearing apparel in part of lace or trimmings at 75 percent under paragraph 1430, Glemby’s v. United States, (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 533, T. D. 41397) followed; (3) artificial flowers the same as those passed upon in Robinson-Goodman v. United States (17 C. C. P. A. 149, T. D. [505]*50543473) at 60 percent under paragraph 1419; (4) silk wearing apparel or silk articles the same as those involved in Abstract 29972 at 60 percent under paragraph 1210; and (6) hats in chief value of straw the same as those passed upon in Stern v. United States (12 Ct. Cust. Appls. 514, T. D. 40701) at 50 percent under paragraph 1406.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 Cust. Ct. 504, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protests-36693-g-of-joseph-inc-cusc-1938.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack