Protests 365248-G of Kargere

U.S. Customs Court

Protests 365248-G of Kargere

1 Cust. Ct. 501

United States Customs Court·Decided November 25, 1938·No. No. 39928·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the mer•chandise in -question was held dutiable as follows: (1) articles or fabrics in chief value of artificial silk similar to the merchandise passed upon in Abstract 37230 at 60 percent under paragraph 31; (2) embroidered articles in part of lace or trimmings the same as those passed upon in Glemby’s v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 533, T. D. 41397) at 75 percent under paragraph 1430; and (3) :artifieial flowers at 60 percent under paragraph 1419, Robinson-Goodman v. United States (17 C. C. P. A. 149, T. D. 43473) followed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the mer•chandise in -question was held dutiable as follows: (1) articles or fabrics in chief value of artificial silk similar to the merchandise passed upon in Abstract 37230 at 60 percent under paragraph 31; (2) embroidered articles in part of lace or trimmings the same as those passed upon in Glemby’s v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 533, T. D. 41397) at 75 percent under paragraph 1430; and (3) :artifieial flowers at 60 percent under paragraph 1419, Robinson-Goodman v. United States (17 C. C. P. A. 149, T. D. 43473) followed.

Protests 365248-G of Kargere, 1 Cust. Ct. 501 (cusc 1938).

Pincite

1 Cust. Ct. 501 (Protests 365248-G of Kargere) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related