Protests 36430-G of Wanamaker

U.S. Customs Court

Protests 36430-G of Wanamaker

4 Cust. Ct. 435

United States Customs Court·Decided April 4, 1940·No. No. 43441·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the merchandise in question was held dutiable as follows: embroidered articles in part of braid similar to those in Pustet v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 530, T. D. 41396) and Normandy lace like that the subject of United States v. Amrein (26 C. C. P. A. 353, C. A. D. 40) at 75 percent under paragraph 1430, and artificial flowers similar to those passed upon in Robinson-Goodman v. United States (17 id. 149, T. D. 43473) at 60 percent under paragraph 1419.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the merchandise in question was held dutiable as follows: embroidered articles in part of braid similar to those in Pustet v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 530, T. D. 41396) and Normandy lace like that the subject of United States v. Amrein (26 C. C. P. A. 353, C. A. D. 40) at 75 percent under paragraph 1430, and artificial flowers similar to those passed upon in Robinson-Goodman v. United States (17 id. 149, T. D. 43473) at 60 percent under paragraph 1419.

Protests 36430-G of Wanamaker, 4 Cust. Ct. 435 (cusc 1940).

Pincite

4 Cust. Ct. 435 (Protests 36430-G of Wanamaker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related