Protests 36430-G of Wanamaker

U.S. Customs Court

Protests 36430-G of Wanamaker

4 Cust. Ct. 435

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedApril 4, 1940

DocketNo. 43441

StatusPublished

This text of 4 Cust. Ct. 435 (Protests 36430-G of Wanamaker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Protests 36430-G of Wanamaker, 4 Cust. Ct. 435 (cusc 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the merchandise in question was held dutiable as follows: embroidered articles in part of braid similar to those in Pustet v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 530, T. D. 41396) and Normandy lace like that the subject of United States v. Amrein (26 C. C. P. A. 353, C. A. D. 40) at 75 percent under paragraph 1430, and artificial flowers similar to those passed upon in Robinson-Goodman v. United States (17 id. 149, T. D. 43473) at 60 percent under paragraph 1419.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the merchandise in question was held dutiable as follows: embroidered articles in part of braid similar to those in Pustet v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 530, T. D. 41396) and Normandy lace like that the subject of United States v. Amrein (26 C. C. P. A. 353, C. A. D. 40) at 75 percent under paragraph 1430, and artificial flowers similar to those passed upon in Robinson-Goodman v. United States (17 id. 149, T. D. 43473) at 60 percent under paragraph 1419.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 Cust. Ct. 435, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protests-36430-g-of-wanamaker-cusc-1940.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack