Protests 361228-G of Dayan Bros.

U.S. Customs Court

Protests 361228-G of Dayan Bros.

2 Cust. Ct. 710

United States Customs Court·Decided May 18, 1939·No. No. 41350·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel articles composed in chief value of cellulose filaments similar to those the subject of Abstract 37230 were held dutiable as compounds of cellulose at 60 percent under paragraph 31, and Alengon lace like that the subject of United States v. Caesar (18 C. C. P. A. 106, T. D. 44067) and filet lace similar to that passed upon in United States v. Jabara (22 C. C. P. A. 77, T. D. 47065) were held dutiable as embroidered at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 as claimed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel articles composed in chief value of cellulose filaments similar to those the subject of Abstract 37230 were held dutiable as compounds of cellulose at 60 percent under paragraph 31, and Alengon lace like that the subject of United States v. Caesar (18 C. C. P. A. 106, T. D. 44067) and filet lace similar to that passed upon in United States v. Jabara (22 C. C. P. A. 77, T. D. 47065) were held dutiable as embroidered at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 as claimed.

Protests 361228-G of Dayan Bros., 2 Cust. Ct. 710 (cusc 1939).

Pincite

2 Cust. Ct. 710 (Protests 361228-G of Dayan Bros.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.