Protests 33329-G of McCreery

U.S. Customs Court

Protests 33329-G of McCreery

3 Cust. Ct. 442

United States Customs Court·Decided October 16, 1939·No. No. 42450·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel embroidered trimmings, allovers, net insertions, flouncings, and trimmings similar to those the subject of Pustet v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 530, T. D. 41396) and Abstract 12555, filet lace articles like those passed upon in United States v. Jabara (22 C. C. P. A. 77, T. D. 47065), Normandy lace articles similar to the merchandise the subject of United States v. Amrein (26 id. 353, C. A. D. 40), and embroidered wearing apparel and pillow cases similar to those passed upon in Pustet v. United States supra, were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 as claimed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel embroidered trimmings, allovers, net insertions, flouncings, and trimmings similar to those the subject of Pustet v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 530, T. D. 41396) and Abstract 12555, filet lace articles like those passed upon in United States v. Jabara (22 C. C. P. A. 77, T. D. 47065), Normandy lace articles similar to the merchandise the subject of United States v. Amrein (26 id. 353, C. A. D. 40), and embroidered wearing apparel and pillow cases similar to those passed upon in Pustet v. United States supra, were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 as claimed.

Protests 33329-G of McCreery, 3 Cust. Ct. 442 (cusc 1939).

Pincite

3 Cust. Ct. 442 (Protests 33329-G of McCreery) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related