Protests 3171—K of E. Leitz, Inc.
5 Cust. Ct. 385
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel the merchandise was held dutiable as photographic cameras or parts at 20 percent under paragraph 1551. Abstract 7038, United States v. Leitz (24 C. C. P. A. 139, T. D. 48622) and United States v. Ziess (id. 145, T. D. 48624) followed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Protests 3171—K of E. Leitz, Inc., 5 Cust. Ct. 385 (cusc 1940).
5 Cust. Ct. 385 (Protests 3171—K of E. Leitz, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.