Protests 313065-G of Gimbel Bros.

U.S. Customs Court

Protests 313065-G of Gimbel Bros.

2 Cust. Ct. 681

United States Customs Court·Decided April 28, 1939·No. No. 41168·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of ■boxes, lamps, coffee percolators, and atomizers chiefly used in the household for utilitarian purposes. The claim at 40 percent under paragraph 339 was therefore sustained. United States v. Friedlaender (21 C. C. P. A. 103, T. D. 46445), Dow v. United States (id. 282, T. D. 46816), and Rice v. United States (T. D. 49373) cited.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of ■boxes, lamps, coffee percolators, and atomizers chiefly used in the household for utilitarian purposes. The claim at 40 percent under paragraph 339 was therefore sustained. United States v. Friedlaender (21 C. C. P. A. 103, T. D. 46445), Dow v. United States (id. 282, T. D. 46816), and Rice v. United States (T. D. 49373) cited.

Protests 313065-G of Gimbel Bros., 2 Cust. Ct. 681 (cusc 1939).

Pincite

2 Cust. Ct. 681 (Protests 313065-G of Gimbel Bros.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.