Protests 312875-G of Saks

U.S. Customs Court

Protests 312875-G of Saks

2 Cust. Ct. 634

United States Customs Court·Decided March 23, 1939·No. No. 40909·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Dallingek, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel atomizers, photo frames, cocktail shakers, and boxes chiefly used in the household for utilitarian purposes were held dutiable at 40 percent under paragraph 339. United States v. Freidlaender (21 C. C. P. A. 103, T. D. 46445), Dow v. United States (id. 282, T. D. 46816), Woolworth v. United States (T. D. 47857), and Rice v. United States (T. D. 49373) cited. Toilet sets similar to those the subject of Abstract 8950 were held dutiable separately, the brushes at 45 percent under paragraph 1407 and the mirrors at 50 percent under paragraph 230.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Dallingek, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel atomizers, photo frames, cocktail shakers, and boxes chiefly used in the household for utilitarian purposes were held dutiable at 40 percent under paragraph 339. United States v. Freidlaender (21 C. C. P. A. 103, T. D. 46445), Dow v. United States (id. 282, T. D. 46816), Woolworth v. United States (T. D. 47857), and Rice v. United States (T. D. 49373) cited. Toilet sets similar to those the subject of Abstract 8950 were held dutiable separately, the brushes at 45 percent under paragraph 1407 and the mirrors at 50 percent under paragraph 230.

Protests 312875-G of Saks, 2 Cust. Ct. 634 (cusc 1939).

Pincite

2 Cust. Ct. 634 (Protests 312875-G of Saks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.