Protests 306894-G of Butler Bros.

1 Cust. Ct. 521
United States Customs Court·Decided December 6, 1938·No. No. 40028·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

It was stipulated that the atomizers and thimbles in question are chiefly used in the household for utilitarian purposes or hollow ware. The claim at 40 percent under paragraph 339 was therefore sustained. United States v. Friedlaender (21 C. C. P. A. 103, T. D. 46445), Dow v. United States (id. 282, T. D. 46816), and Rice v. United States (T. D. 49373) cited.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Protests 306894-G of Butler Bros., 1 Cust. Ct. 521 (cusc 1938).

1 Cust. Ct. 521 (Protests 306894-G of Butler Bros.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.