Protests 303906-G of Steinhardt
1 Cust. Ct. 545
Opinion
Opinion by
It was stipulated that the atomizers and thimbles in question are chiefly used in the household for utilitarian purposes or are hollow ware. The claim at 40 percent under paragraph 339 was therefore sustained. United States v. Friedlaender (21 C. C. P. A. 103, T. D. 46445), Dow v. United States (id. 282, T. D. 46816), and Rice v. United States (T. D. 49373) cited.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Protests 303906-G of Steinhardt, 1 Cust. Ct. 545 (cusc 1938).
1 Cust. Ct. 545 (Protests 303906-G of Steinhardt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.