Protests 302583-G of Shalom
4 Cust. Ct. 388
Opinion
Opinion by
From the evidence it was found that certain items consist of Venice laces similar to those involved in Littwitz v. United States (3 Cust. Ct. 123, C. D. 217) and filet lace, Saxony lace, and Normandy lace similar to the merchandise passed upon in United States v. Jabara (22 C. C. P. A. 77, T. D. 47065), Beyda v. United States (T. D. 46177), and United States v. Amrein (26 C. C. P. A. 353, C. A. D. 40). The claim at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 was therefore sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Protests 302583-G of Shalom, 4 Cust. Ct. 388 (cusc 1940).
4 Cust. Ct. 388 (Protests 302583-G of Shalom) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Max Littwitz, Inc. v. United States
3 Cust. Ct. 123 (U.S. Customs Court, 1939)