Protests 302583-G of Shalom

U.S. Customs Court

Protests 302583-G of Shalom

4 Cust. Ct. 388

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedFebruary 1, 1940

DocketNo. 43174

StatusPublished

This text of 4 Cust. Ct. 388 (Protests 302583-G of Shalom) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Protests 302583-G of Shalom, 4 Cust. Ct. 388 (cusc 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

From the evidence it was found that certain items consist of Venice laces similar to those involved in Littwitz v. United States (3 Cust. Ct. 123, C. D. 217) and filet lace, Saxony lace, and Normandy lace similar to the merchandise passed upon in United States v. Jabara (22 C. C. P. A. 77, T. D. 47065), Beyda v. United States (T. D. 46177), and United States v. Amrein (26 C. C. P. A. 353, C. A. D. 40). The claim at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 was therefore sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

From the evidence it was found that certain items consist of Venice laces similar to those involved in Littwitz v. United States (3 Cust. Ct. 123, C. D. 217) and filet lace, Saxony lace, and Normandy lace similar to the merchandise passed upon in United States v. Jabara (22 C. C. P. A. 77, T. D. 47065), Beyda v. United States (T. D. 46177), and United States v. Amrein (26 C. C. P. A. 353, C. A. D. 40). The claim at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 was therefore sustained.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 Cust. Ct. 388, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protests-302583-g-of-shalom-cusc-1940.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack