Protests 288934-G of Jabbour
4 Cust. Ct. 435
This text of 4 Cust. Ct. 435 (Protests 288934-G of Jabbour) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Protests 288934-G of Jabbour, 4 Cust. Ct. 435 (cusc 1940).
Opinion
Opinion by
Venice lace similar to that involved in Littwitz v. United States (3 Cust. Ct. 123, C. D. 217) and linen articles embroidered and trimmed with lace the same as the merchandise passed upon in Pustet v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 530, T. D. 41396) were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 as claimed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Max Littwitz, Inc. v. United States
3 Cust. Ct. 123 (U.S. Customs Court, 1939)
Pustet v. United States
13 Ct. Cust. 530 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1926)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
4 Cust. Ct. 435, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protests-288934-g-of-jabbour-cusc-1940.