Protests 288934-G of Jabbour
4 Cust. Ct. 435
Opinion
Opinion by
Venice lace similar to that involved in Littwitz v. United States (3 Cust. Ct. 123, C. D. 217) and linen articles embroidered and trimmed with lace the same as the merchandise passed upon in Pustet v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 530, T. D. 41396) were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 as claimed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Protests 288934-G of Jabbour, 4 Cust. Ct. 435 (cusc 1940).
4 Cust. Ct. 435 (Protests 288934-G of Jabbour) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Max Littwitz, Inc. v. United States
3 Cust. Ct. 123 (U.S. Customs Court, 1939)
Pustet v. United States
13 Ct. Cust. 530 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1926)