Protests 279191-G of Saks
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel, bottles, lamps, atomizers, photo frames, trays, atomizers and droppers, baskets, boxes, corks, tantalus set, and match holders chiefly used in the household were [434] held dutiable at 40 percent under paragraph 339. United States v. Friedlaender (21 C. C. P. A. 103, T. D. 46445), Dow v. United States (id. 282, T. D. 46816), Woolworth v. United States (T. D. 47867), Rice v. United States (T. D. 49373), and Abstract 34153 cited. Hollow flasks plated with gold or silver like those the subject of Viking Trading Co. v. United States (C. D. 132) were held dutiable at 40 percent under paragraph 339. On the authority of Abstract 8950 brushes were held dutiable at 45 percent under paragraph 1407 and mirrors at 50 percent under paragraph 230 as claimed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
3 Cust. Ct. 433 (Protests 279191-G of Saks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.