Protests 272340-G of Central Madeira Corp.

U.S. Customs Court

Protests 272340-G of Central Madeira Corp.

5 Cust. Ct. 265

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedJune 26, 1940

DocketNo. 44032

StatusPublished

This text of 5 Cust. Ct. 265 (Protests 272340-G of Central Madeira Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Protests 272340-G of Central Madeira Corp., 5 Cust. Ct. 265 (cusc 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel filet laces and lace articles were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430, United States v. Jabara (22 C. C. P. A. 77, T. D. 47065 and Pustet v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 530, T. D. 41396) followed. Napkins and towels in chief value of flax were held dutiable at 55 percent under paragraph 1014, and those in chief value of vegetable fibers other than cotton at 40 percent under paragraph 1021. United States v. Macksoud (27 C. C. P. A. 218, C. A. D. 87) followed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel filet laces and lace articles were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430, United States v. Jabara (22 C. C. P. A. 77, T. D. 47065 and Pustet v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 530, T. D. 41396) followed. Napkins and towels in chief value of flax were held dutiable at 55 percent under paragraph 1014, and those in chief value of vegetable fibers other than cotton at 40 percent under paragraph 1021. United States v. Macksoud (27 C. C. P. A. 218, C. A. D. 87) followed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

5 Cust. Ct. 265, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protests-272340-g-of-central-madeira-corp-cusc-1940.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack