Protests 272340-G of Central Madeira Corp.

U.S. Customs Court

Protests 272340-G of Central Madeira Corp.

5 Cust. Ct. 265

United States Customs Court·Decided June 26, 1940·No. No. 44032·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel filet laces and lace articles were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430, United States v. Jabara (22 C. C. P. A. 77, T. D. 47065 and Pustet v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 530, T. D. 41396) followed. Napkins and towels in chief value of flax were held dutiable at 55 percent under paragraph 1014, and those in chief value of vegetable fibers other than cotton at 40 percent under paragraph 1021. United States v. Macksoud (27 C. C. P. A. 218, C. A. D. 87) followed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel filet laces and lace articles were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430, United States v. Jabara (22 C. C. P. A. 77, T. D. 47065 and Pustet v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 530, T. D. 41396) followed. Napkins and towels in chief value of flax were held dutiable at 55 percent under paragraph 1014, and those in chief value of vegetable fibers other than cotton at 40 percent under paragraph 1021. United States v. Macksoud (27 C. C. P. A. 218, C. A. D. 87) followed.

Protests 272340-G of Central Madeira Corp., 5 Cust. Ct. 265 (cusc 1940).

Pincite

5 Cust. Ct. 265 (Protests 272340-G of Central Madeira Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related