Protests 262223-G of Carnegie

U.S. Customs Court

Protests 262223-G of Carnegie

1 Cust. Ct. 475

United States Customs Court·Decided November 10, 1938·No. No. 39809·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the merchandise in .question was held dutiable as follows: (1) cellulose filaments the same as those passed upon in Abstract 37230 at 60 percent under paragraph 31; C2) em[476]*476broidered articles and embroidered wearing apparel like those the subject of Glemby’s v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 533, T. D. 41397) at 75 percent under paragraph 1430; and (3) artificial flowers the same as those the subject of Robinson-Goodman v. United States (17 C. C. P. A. 149, T. D. 43473) at 60 percent under paragraph 1419.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the merchandise in .question was held dutiable as follows: (1) cellulose filaments the same as those passed upon in Abstract 37230 at 60 percent under paragraph 31; C2) em[476]*476broidered articles and embroidered wearing apparel like those the subject of Glemby’s v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 533, T. D. 41397) at 75 percent under paragraph 1430; and (3) artificial flowers the same as those the subject of Robinson-Goodman v. United States (17 C. C. P. A. 149, T. D. 43473) at 60 percent under paragraph 1419.

Protests 262223-G of Carnegie, 1 Cust. Ct. 475 (cusc 1938).

Pincite

1 Cust. Ct. 475 (Protests 262223-G of Carnegie) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related