Protests 260506-G of Joseph, Inc.

U.S. Customs Court

Protests 260506-G of Joseph, Inc.

2 Cust. Ct. 564

United States Customs Court·Decided January 30, 1939·No. No. 40556·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the merchandise in question was held dutiable as follows: (1) fabrics or articles in chief value of artificial silk the same as those passed upon in Abstract 37230 at 60 percent under paragraph 31; (2) embroidered wearing apparel in part of lace or trimmings [565]*565at 75 percent under paragraph 1430, Glemby’s v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 533, T. D. 41397) followed; (3) artificial flowers the same as those passed upon in Robinson-Goodman v. United States (17 C. C. P. A. 149, T. D. 43473) at 60 percent under paragraph 1419.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the merchandise in question was held dutiable as follows: (1) fabrics or articles in chief value of artificial silk the same as those passed upon in Abstract 37230 at 60 percent under paragraph 31; (2) embroidered wearing apparel in part of lace or trimmings [565]*565at 75 percent under paragraph 1430, Glemby’s v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 533, T. D. 41397) followed; (3) artificial flowers the same as those passed upon in Robinson-Goodman v. United States (17 C. C. P. A. 149, T. D. 43473) at 60 percent under paragraph 1419.

Protests 260506-G of Joseph, Inc., 2 Cust. Ct. 564 (cusc 1939).

Pincite

2 Cust. Ct. 564 (Protests 260506-G of Joseph, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related