Protests 249267-G of Gimbel Bros.
3 Cust. Ct. 446
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel the candlesticks and atomizers in question were held dutiable at 40 percent under paragraph 339. United States v. Friedlaender (21 C. C. P. A. 103, T. D. 46445), [447] Dow v. United States (id. 282, T. D. 46816), and Rice v. United States (T. D. 49373) cited.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Protests 249267-G of Gimbel Bros., 3 Cust. Ct. 446 (cusc 1939).
3 Cust. Ct. 446 (Protests 249267-G of Gimbel Bros.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.