Protests 249266-G of Gimbel Bros., Inc.

2 Cust. Ct. 559
United States Customs Court·Decided January 25, 1939·No. No. 40522·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of baskets, teapots, sugar spoons, cream pitchers, dishes, cruets, egg stands, toast and butter stands, thimbles, trays, photo frames, crumb trays and scoops, atomizers, boxes, vases and bottles chiefly used in the kitchen, on the table, or in the .household for utilitarian purposes. The claim at 40 percent under paragraph 339 was therefore sustained. United States v. Friedlaender (21 C. C. P. A. 103, T. D. 46445), Dow v. United States (id. 282, T. D. 46816), Woolworth v. United States (T. D. 47857), and Rice v. United States (T. D. 49373) cited.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Protests 249266-G of Gimbel Bros., Inc., 2 Cust. Ct. 559 (cusc 1939).

2 Cust. Ct. 559 (Protests 249266-G of Gimbel Bros., Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.