Protests 210251-G of A. D. Sutton & Son

U.S. Customs Court

Protests 210251-G of A. D. Sutton & Son

4 Cust. Ct. 461

United States Customs Court·Decided April 29, 1940·No. No. 43605·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

The evidence showed that certain items consist of Venice laces similar to those involved in Littwitz v. United States (C. D. 217), filet laces like those the subject of United States v. Jabara (22 C. C. P. A. 77, T. D. 47065), flouncing like that passed upon in United States v. Ramig (17 id. 365, T. D. 43809), and other items of laces similar to those the subject of United States v. Case (20 id. 185, T. D. 45979). The claim at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 was therefore sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

The evidence showed that certain items consist of Venice laces similar to those involved in Littwitz v. United States (C. D. 217), filet laces like those the subject of United States v. Jabara (22 C. C. P. A. 77, T. D. 47065), flouncing like that passed upon in United States v. Ramig (17 id. 365, T. D. 43809), and other items of laces similar to those the subject of United States v. Case (20 id. 185, T. D. 45979). The claim at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 was therefore sustained.

Protests 210251-G of A. D. Sutton & Son, 4 Cust. Ct. 461 (cusc 1940).

Pincite

4 Cust. Ct. 461 (Protests 210251-G of A. D. Sutton & Son) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.