Protests 210251-G of A. D. Sutton & Son

U.S. Customs Court

Protests 210251-G of A. D. Sutton & Son

4 Cust. Ct. 461

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedApril 29, 1940

DocketNo. 43605

StatusPublished

This text of 4 Cust. Ct. 461 (Protests 210251-G of A. D. Sutton & Son) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Protests 210251-G of A. D. Sutton & Son, 4 Cust. Ct. 461 (cusc 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

The evidence showed that certain items consist of Venice laces similar to those involved in Littwitz v. United States (C. D. 217), filet laces like those the subject of United States v. Jabara (22 C. C. P. A. 77, T. D. 47065), flouncing like that passed upon in United States v. Ramig (17 id. 365, T. D. 43809), and other items of laces similar to those the subject of United States v. Case (20 id. 185, T. D. 45979). The claim at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 was therefore sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

The evidence showed that certain items consist of Venice laces similar to those involved in Littwitz v. United States (C. D. 217), filet laces like those the subject of United States v. Jabara (22 C. C. P. A. 77, T. D. 47065), flouncing like that passed upon in United States v. Ramig (17 id. 365, T. D. 43809), and other items of laces similar to those the subject of United States v. Case (20 id. 185, T. D. 45979). The claim at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 was therefore sustained.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 Cust. Ct. 461, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protests-210251-g-of-a-d-sutton-son-cusc-1940.