Protests 19799-K of Pressner
This text of 7 Cust. Ct. 279 (Protests 19799-K of Pressner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the siren whistles in question are in chief value of metal the claim at 45 percent under paragraph 397 was sustained on the authority of Abstracts 39948 and 40480. Whistling balloons, rubber balloons, and noisemakers stipulated to be composed in part of bamboo, similar to those the subject of Abstract 40493, were held dutiable as bamboo articles at 45 percent under paragraph 409 as claimed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
7 Cust. Ct. 279, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protests-19799-k-of-pressner-cusc-1941.