Protests 195231-G of G. & S. Embroidery Co.

2 Cust. Ct. 775
United States Customs Court·Decided June 23, 1939·No. No. 41705·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the-authority of Pustet v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 530, T. D. 41396) articles embroidered and trimmed with lace and Normandy laces like those the subject of United States v. Amrein (26 C. C. P. A. 353, C. A. D. 40) were held dutiable at 75-percent under paragraph 1430 as claimed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Protests 195231-G of G. & S. Embroidery Co., 2 Cust. Ct. 775 (cusc 1939).

2 Cust. Ct. 775 (Protests 195231-G of G. & S. Embroidery Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pustet v. United States
13 Ct. Cust. 530 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1926)