Protests 193221-G of Lord
This text of 3 Cust. Ct. 373 (Protests 193221-G of Lord) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of Pustet v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 530, T. D. 41396), Abstract 12555, United States v. Jabara (22 C. C. P. A. 77, T. D. 47065), and United States v. Amrein (26 id. 353, C. A. D. 40) embroidered trimmings, filet lace articles, Normandy lace articles, and embroidered sachets, wearing apparel, cushions, and handkerchiefs were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430. Artificial flowers similar to those the subject of Robinson-Goodman v. United States (17 C. C. P. A. 149, T. D. 43473) were held dutiable at 60 percent under paragraph 1419.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
3 Cust. Ct. 373, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protests-193221-g-of-lord-cusc-1939.