Protests 193188-G of Lord

U.S. Customs Court

Protests 193188-G of Lord

1 Cust. Ct. 522

United States Customs Court·Decided December 7, 1938·No. No. 40042·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the merchandise in question was held dutiable as follows: (1) embroidered net trimmings similar to those the subject of Abstract 12555 and other embroidered articles like those the subject of Pustet v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 530, T. D. 41396) at 75 percent under paragraph 1430; (2) wool knit apparel at 45 cents per pound and 50 percent ad valorem under paragraph 1114, Abstract 16064 followed; and (3) wearing apparel in chief value of artificial silk at 60 percent under paragraph 31, Abstract 37230 followed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the merchandise in question was held dutiable as follows: (1) embroidered net trimmings similar to those the subject of Abstract 12555 and other embroidered articles like those the subject of Pustet v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 530, T. D. 41396) at 75 percent under paragraph 1430; (2) wool knit apparel at 45 cents per pound and 50 percent ad valorem under paragraph 1114, Abstract 16064 followed; and (3) wearing apparel in chief value of artificial silk at 60 percent under paragraph 31, Abstract 37230 followed.

Protests 193188-G of Lord, 1 Cust. Ct. 522 (cusc 1938).

Pincite

1 Cust. Ct. 522 (Protests 193188-G of Lord) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related