Protests 193064-G of Lord

U.S. Customs Court

Protests 193064-G of Lord

4 Cust. Ct. 466

United States Customs Court·Decided May 6, 1940·No. No. 43634·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel embroidered-net galloons similar to those involved in Abstract 12555, filet lace articles like those covered by United States v. Jabara (22 C. C. P. A. 77, T. D. 47065), Normandy laces similar to those passed upon in United States v. Amrein (26 id. 353, C. A. D. 40), and embroidered wearing apparel like that the subject of Pustet v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 530, T. D. 41396) were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 as claimed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel embroidered-net galloons similar to those involved in Abstract 12555, filet lace articles like those covered by United States v. Jabara (22 C. C. P. A. 77, T. D. 47065), Normandy laces similar to those passed upon in United States v. Amrein (26 id. 353, C. A. D. 40), and embroidered wearing apparel like that the subject of Pustet v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 530, T. D. 41396) were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 as claimed.

Protests 193064-G of Lord, 4 Cust. Ct. 466 (cusc 1940).

Pincite

4 Cust. Ct. 466 (Protests 193064-G of Lord) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related