Protests 193064-G of Lord

U.S. Customs Court

Protests 193064-G of Lord

4 Cust. Ct. 466

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedMay 6, 1940

DocketNo. 43634

StatusPublished

This text of 4 Cust. Ct. 466 (Protests 193064-G of Lord) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Protests 193064-G of Lord, 4 Cust. Ct. 466 (cusc 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel embroidered-net galloons similar to those involved in Abstract 12555, filet lace articles like those covered by United States v. Jabara (22 C. C. P. A. 77, T. D. 47065), Normandy laces similar to those passed upon in United States v. Amrein (26 id. 353, C. A. D. 40), and embroidered wearing apparel like that the subject of Pustet v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 530, T. D. 41396) were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 as claimed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel embroidered-net galloons similar to those involved in Abstract 12555, filet lace articles like those covered by United States v. Jabara (22 C. C. P. A. 77, T. D. 47065), Normandy laces similar to those passed upon in United States v. Amrein (26 id. 353, C. A. D. 40), and embroidered wearing apparel like that the subject of Pustet v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 530, T. D. 41396) were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 as claimed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 Cust. Ct. 466, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protests-193064-g-of-lord-cusc-1940.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack