Protests 192915-G of Lord

U.S. Customs Court

Protests 192915-G of Lord

3 Cust. Ct. 442

United States Customs Court·Decided October 16, 1939·No. No. 42448·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of Pustet v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 530, T. D. 41396), Abstract 12555, United States v. Jabara (22 C. C. P. A. 77, T. D. 47065), and United States v. Amrein (26 id. 353, C. A. D. 40) embroidered allovers, net trimmings, galloons, and motifs, and filet and Normandy lace articles were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 as claimed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of Pustet v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 530, T. D. 41396), Abstract 12555, United States v. Jabara (22 C. C. P. A. 77, T. D. 47065), and United States v. Amrein (26 id. 353, C. A. D. 40) embroidered allovers, net trimmings, galloons, and motifs, and filet and Normandy lace articles were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 as claimed.

Protests 192915-G of Lord, 3 Cust. Ct. 442 (cusc 1939).

Pincite

3 Cust. Ct. 442 (Protests 192915-G of Lord) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related