Protests 192915-G of Lord

U.S. Customs Court

Protests 192915-G of Lord

3 Cust. Ct. 442

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedOctober 16, 1939

DocketNo. 42448

StatusPublished

This text of 3 Cust. Ct. 442 (Protests 192915-G of Lord) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Protests 192915-G of Lord, 3 Cust. Ct. 442 (cusc 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of Pustet v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 530, T. D. 41396), Abstract 12555, United States v. Jabara (22 C. C. P. A. 77, T. D. 47065), and United States v. Amrein (26 id. 353, C. A. D. 40) embroidered allovers, net trimmings, galloons, and motifs, and filet and Normandy lace articles were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 as claimed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of Pustet v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 530, T. D. 41396), Abstract 12555, United States v. Jabara (22 C. C. P. A. 77, T. D. 47065), and United States v. Amrein (26 id. 353, C. A. D. 40) embroidered allovers, net trimmings, galloons, and motifs, and filet and Normandy lace articles were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 as claimed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 Cust. Ct. 442, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protests-192915-g-of-lord-cusc-1939.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack