Protests 185729-G of Gimbel Bros.

U.S. Customs Court

Protests 185729-G of Gimbel Bros.

3 Cust. Ct. 475

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedNovember 14, 1939

DocketNo. 42670

StatusPublished

This text of 3 Cust. Ct. 475 (Protests 185729-G of Gimbel Bros.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Protests 185729-G of Gimbel Bros., 3 Cust. Ct. 475 (cusc 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of Abstract 16064 and United States v. International Clearing House (24 C. C. P. A. 117, T. D. 48416) knit wool wearing apparel was held dutiable at 45 dents per pound and 50 percent ad valorem under paragraph 1114. Embroidered wearing apparel and embroidered veils similar to those the subject of Pustet v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 530, T. D. 41396) and Abstract 11620 were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of Abstract 16064 and United States v. International Clearing House (24 C. C. P. A. 117, T. D. 48416) knit wool wearing apparel was held dutiable at 45 dents per pound and 50 percent ad valorem under paragraph 1114. Embroidered wearing apparel and embroidered veils similar to those the subject of Pustet v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 530, T. D. 41396) and Abstract 11620 were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 Cust. Ct. 475, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protests-185729-g-of-gimbel-bros-cusc-1939.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack