Protests 185729-G of Gimbel Bros.

U.S. Customs Court

Protests 185729-G of Gimbel Bros.

3 Cust. Ct. 475

United States Customs Court·Decided November 14, 1939·No. No. 42670·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of Abstract 16064 and United States v. International Clearing House (24 C. C. P. A. 117, T. D. 48416) knit wool wearing apparel was held dutiable at 45 dents per pound and 50 percent ad valorem under paragraph 1114. Embroidered wearing apparel and embroidered veils similar to those the subject of Pustet v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 530, T. D. 41396) and Abstract 11620 were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of Abstract 16064 and United States v. International Clearing House (24 C. C. P. A. 117, T. D. 48416) knit wool wearing apparel was held dutiable at 45 dents per pound and 50 percent ad valorem under paragraph 1114. Embroidered wearing apparel and embroidered veils similar to those the subject of Pustet v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 530, T. D. 41396) and Abstract 11620 were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430.

Protests 185729-G of Gimbel Bros., 3 Cust. Ct. 475 (cusc 1939).

Pincite

3 Cust. Ct. 475 (Protests 185729-G of Gimbel Bros.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related