Protests 179948-G of Gimbel Bros.

3 Cust. Ct. 434
United States Customs Court·Decided October 11, 1939·No. No. 42399·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of boxes, cups, bottles, photo frames, atomizers, dishes, vases, shakers, plates, jugs, place-card stands, liqueur sets, whisky sets, cocktail sets, atomizers and droppers, and bridge sets chiefly used on the table or in the kitchen or household for utilitarian purposes. The claim at 40 percent under, paragraph 339 was therefore sustained. United States v. Friedlaender (21 C. C. P. A. 103, T. D. 46445), Dow v. United States (id. 282, T. D. 46816), Woolworth v. United States (T. D. 47857), Rice v. United States (T. D. 49373), and Abstracts 39456 and 27907 cited. On the authority of Abstract 8950 the toilet,sets were held separately dutiable, the brushes at 45 percent under paragraph 1407 and the mirrors at 50 percent under paragraph 230 as claimed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Protests 179948-G of Gimbel Bros., 3 Cust. Ct. 434 (cusc 1939).

3 Cust. Ct. 434 (Protests 179948-G of Gimbel Bros.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.